Pew Environment Group

Media Inquiries

If you are a journalist and would like additional information, please visit the Media Contacts page.

Media Contacts

Subscribe to News Feeds

Pew offers news delivered to your desktop via RSS feed. Subscribing is easy. To learn more or get started, follow the link below.

Subscribe to News Feeds

For The Record

When the Pew Environment Group’s work is questioned or criticized we respond through letters to the editor or op-eds.

Read Pew's Responses

Three Steps to Prepare for a Changing Arctic

Opinion

Related Experts

  • Marilyn Heiman

    Marilyn Heiman

    Director, U.S. Arctic Program

    Read bio

     

See all of our Experts

Author(s)

Marilyn Heiman

Author(s) Description

Director of the Pew Environment Group's offshore energy reform efforts and the U.S. Arctic Program

Marilyn Heiman responds to Sen. Mark Begich's (D-Alaska) blog Is the U.S. Prepared for a Changing Arctic? on NationalJournal.com.

Here are three steps the United States should take today to address the rapid changes already underway in the Arctic:

1) Develop a comprehensive research and monitoring plan to guide decisions about America’s Arctic Ocean.

2) Set aside ecologically significant areas for protection.

3) Ensure that strong standards and capacity are in place to prevent and respond to oil spills in the Arctic.

Today, this extreme yet fragile region, including its rich human culture, is facing upheaval caused by a changing climate. The Arctic is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the planet, putting one of the world’s last relatively untouched ecosystems under great stress. Rapid industrial development would add even more strain, bringing significant water, air, and noise pollution. The cumulative effects of oil and gas exploration and development, as well as maintenance and service activities, on this pristine ecosystem are unknown.

Science must guide our way if we are to avoid irreparable harm to this unique place. A long-term monitoring plan is critical for understanding the changes already underway and avoiding or mitigating future damage.

Protecting biologically sensitive areas from oil and gas drilling would provide a haven for migrating, feeding or reproduction of marine mammals and birds already struggling with retreating sea ice and other climate-induced habitat loss. Such areas would benefit not just wildlife, but the indigenous communities that have thrived along the Arctic coast for thousands of years—while practicing a traditional way of life dependent on the region’s natural bounty.

Then there’s the ever-present risk of an oil spill. A Deepwater Horizon type spill here would be devastating. There are no road systems, no major ports and no permanent Coast Guard presence to deal with a spill. Oil in sea ice is nearly impossible to remove with current techniques.

As Alaska and the world are racing forward to figure out how to deal with the challenges and opportunities of a more open Arctic, we must not leap without looking—or planning. The nation faces a historic choice: Allow unchecked development of the extreme, remote and fragile U.S. Arctic Ocean, or ensure that scientific research and adequate spill prevention and response, in consultation with indigenous communities, provide a path to a sustainable environment and way of life.

 

Related News and Resources

  • Do We Know Enough to Ensure Safe Arctic Drilling?

    • Opinion
    • May 15, 2012

    (New Scientist) For the oil and gas industry, the Arctic Ocean is the final frontier. Beneath the ocean floor lies an estimated 90 billion barrels of recoverable oil - about 13 per cent of the global total. As the sea ice retreats and traditional sources of hydrocarbons dwindle, the pressure to drill is becoming irresistible.

    More

  • National Journal Profiles Marilyn Heiman, U.S. Arctic Program Director

    • Media Coverage
    • May 11, 2012

    For Marilyn Heiman, director of the U.S. Arctic Program for the Pew Environment Group, there is life before the Exxon Valdez and life after the Exxon Valdez.

    More

  • Safeguarding the Arctic a Must

    • Opinion
    • May 01, 2012

    Marilyn Heiman responds to Michael Bromwich's blog What More Can Be Done to Ensure Safe Offshore Drilling? on NationalJournal.com.

    More

  • Videos: U.S. Arctic Program

    • Other Resource
    • May 01, 2012

    These videos and reports give you an insight into the people and issues that Pew’s U.S. Arctic Program works with every day.

    More

  • Scientists Issue Call for Arctic Fisheries Plan

    • Media Coverage
    • Apr 24, 2012

    (Disovery News) More than 2,000 scientists from 67 nations have signed an open letter calling for the development of an international fisheries agreement that would protect the waters of the Central Arctic Ocean.

    More

  • International Polar Year Conference

    • Other Resource
    • Apr 22, 2012

    A group of academics, advocates, scientists, decision makers, indigenous peoples, and industry representatives will attend the International Polar Year (IPY) 2012 Conference in Montreal from April 22 to 27.

    More

  • More than 2,000 Scientists Worldwide Urge Protection of Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries

    • Press Release
    • Apr 22, 2012

    More than 2,000 scientists from 67 countries urged Arctic leaders, in an open letter released today by the Pew Environment Group, to develop an international fisheries accord that would protect the unregulated waters of the Central Arctic Ocean.

    More

  • Leaders Urged to Impose Moratorium on Industrial Fishing in the Arctic

    • Media Coverage
    • Apr 22, 2012

    (Vancouver Sun) The leaders of the five Arctic coastal states — including Prime Minister Stephen Harper — are being urged by more than 2,000 scientists from around the world to impose a moratorium on industrial fishing in the increasingly accessible waters of the central Arctic Ocean until experts can determine the size and sustainability of the resource.

    More

  • Scientists Urge Canada to Postpone Commercial Fishing in the Arctic

    • Media Coverage
    • Apr 22, 2012

    (The Globe and Mail) More than 2,000 scientists from 67 countries, including 551 from Canada, are calling for a moratorium on commercial fishing in the Arctic until research can determine what lies in waters that were once covered year-round by the polar ice cap and set sustainable catch levels.

    More

X
Sign In

Member Sign In

Forgot Password?
Submit Not a Member? Join!
X

Forgot Password?

Send Password Not a Member? Join!
X

Change Password

X
(All Fields are required)
Send Message
Share this on: